心与理：童、刘江南园林研究再比较#

Mind vs. Principle: Comparison of Jiangnan Gardening Research Between Tung and Liu

摘要:

童寯和刘敦桢是建筑界园林研究的代表人物，研究通过对二者代表著作的文本阅读和话语分析，从历史编纂学和历史理论的角度，把握童、刘江南园林著作的编纂逻辑，分析其知识建构的理论预设，并用心学和理学概括二者的区别。研究指出，在本体论上，童强调文人主导，刘推崇无名工匠；在认识论上，童推崇诗、画、园的统一，刘强调空间组织及“视点 - 路线”的视角；在方法论上，童体现中西交流，刘突出古今对接；在实践观上，童有所不为，刘推陈出新。

Abstract:

Tong Chuin and Liu Dunzhen are representative figures of gardening research. By text reading and discourse analysis, this article attempts to grasp two authors’ compilation logic on their works of Jiangnan gardening and analyzes their theoretical presupposition of knowledge construction from the perspective of historiography and historical theory. this article summarizes their difference by using the concept of mind and principle from Confucianism. On the ontology, Tung emphasizes on literati’s dominance, while Liu canonizes the nameless craftsman; on the epistemology, Tung stresses the unity of poetry, painting and garden, whereas Liu emphasizes the spatial organization and "viewpoint-route" perspective; on methodology,Tung embodies the exchange between China and West, while Liu highlights the connection between ancient and modern; in the practice, Tung leaves some things undone, whereas Liu gets rid of the stale and brings forth the fresh.