中国古建筑的历史分期

On Division of Historical Periods of Chinese Architecture

摘要:

关于中国古建筑的历史分期问题，国内外学术界（建筑界、史学界）向来未取得统一的意见。梁思成先生在他所写的《中国建筑史》中的论述、日本学者伊藤清造在其所著的《支那建筑史》中的论述，以及刘敦桢先生主编的《中国古代建筑史》的论述中都有对于中国古代建筑史分期的说法，它们中有按社会发展史即政治历史阶段来划分的，也有按生产力水平及建筑状况来划分的。而作者认为我国古代建筑历史的发展分期，应该做到既能照顾到社会发展进程对建筑的影响，又能概括某个阶段的建筑特点和在建筑史的地位。

Abstract:

As for the historical division of Chinese traditional architecture, the academic circles (architecture and history) at home and abroad have not reached a unified opinion. Mr. Liang Sicheng in his "History of Chinese Architecture", Japanese scholar Ito Kiyozo in his "History of Chugoku Architecture", and Mr. Liu Dunzhen in the "History of Chinese Ancient Architecture" ，they all has viewpoint of divided the history of Chinese traditional architecture. Some of them are divided according to the history of social development, that is, the stage of political history, and some are divided according to the level of productivity and the condition of buildings. The author thinks that the development stages of traditional Chinese architectural history should not only take into account the influence of social development process on architecture, but also summarize the architectural characteristics of a certain stage and its position in architectural history.